Operations

Procurement comparisons built from quotes, not from vendor websites

A worker researches the field, collects what the vendors actually told you, and lists the questions you have not asked yet. You choose.

What the worker does

An AI worker in Polaris supports procurement by researching the available options with web search, collecting the quotes and answers vendors sent to your Gmail, and building a comparison table where every cell cites its source. It separates published pricing from what you were actually quoted, and lists the questions no vendor has answered. The buying decision and the negotiation stay with a person.

Connections
web search · Gmail · Google Drive
Every cell
Cites its source
Separated
Published price vs quoted price

The comparison spreadsheet is where procurement quietly goes wrong

Someone builds a grid of five vendors across nine criteria. Three of the cells come from a marketing page, two come from a sales call, one is a guess, and none of them says which is which. The grid then gets shown to a decision-maker who treats every cell as equally solid.

The fix is not a better grid. It is provenance: every cell carrying where it came from, so a reader can see instantly that the security answer came from a vendor's own website and the price came from a written quote.

That is dull work to do by hand and easy for a worker, which reads, cites and stops short of forming a preference.

How the comparison is built

Row sourceHow it is markedHow much it should count
A written quote in your mailboxQuoted, with the sender and dateThe only pricing evidence worth planning on
Public pricing pageURL and date observedA starting point that often does not survive a call
A claim on a vendor's marketing siteQuoted, marked as vendor-statedUseful for what they choose to emphasize, not as fact
An answer from a sales callOnly if someone wrote it down and it is in the threadAs good as the note taken
No answer from anyoneListed as an open question, not left blankThis is the row that decides the deal later

The questions a worker will surface that nobody asked

Ask it to produce this list explicitly. It is usually more valuable than the comparison itself.

  • What happens at renewal

    Published pricing rarely mentions the increase mechanism, and it is a question that costs money if you skip it.

  • What the exit looks like

    Data export format, notice period and what happens to your records afterwards.

  • Which stated capability is actually available on the plan you are quoted

    The gap between the feature page and the tier in the quote is a recurring source of unpleasant surprises.

  • Who else in the company already pays this vendor

    The worker can check the vendor register and the charges before you buy a second contract with the same supplier.

Questions people ask

+Can the worker contact vendors for quotes?

It drafts the enquiry and a person sends it. Nothing is sent to a third party by a worker, which also means no vendor gets a machine-written enquiry with your company name on it that nobody read first.

+How current is the pricing research?

It reads public pages at the time it runs and records the date it observed them. Published pricing changes without notice, which is why the comparison marks a written quote as a different class of evidence from a web page.

+What happens after we choose?

The signed agreement goes into the vendor register, where the finance view tracks the spend and the renewal and the legal view tracks the terms. Running procurement in the same workspace means the decision, the quotes and the resulting contract stay linked.

+Is this worth it for a small purchase?

Probably not for a small one-off. It earns its place on recurring commitments and anything with an auto-renewal, where the cost of an unasked question compounds annually.

Your next hire takes 60 seconds.

The software is free — unlimited people, tasks, workstreams and docs. You pay only for work an AI worker actually delivers, itemised by the hour.

Get started free

Last checked .