For design studios

Polaris for design studios

Nobody has ever put a line item for asset renaming on an invoice, and every studio pays for it anyway.

The short answer

Design studios bill for design work and absorb everything surrounding it: handoff specifications, weekly client updates, asset naming and organisation, brand consistency audits and scoping documents. Polaris lets that surrounding layer be assigned to AI workers, with Figma in the connection catalog, deliverables arriving as files on the task, and a designer closing every task before it counts as done.

Where a studio actually loses money

A studio quotes for a piece of design work, and the design work usually lands roughly where it was estimated. What blows the estimate is the layer around it. The specification a developer needs before they can build the thing. The weekly update to a client who is anxious because they cannot see progress. Renaming three hundred exports so the handoff is usable. The audit of whether the brand still looks like itself across nine surfaces after a year of small decisions.

None of this is design and all of it is required. It is also the work that gets deprioritised when a deadline tightens, which is exactly when its absence causes the most damage: a rushed handoff produces a build that does not match, and the studio absorbs the correction round.

Five jobs that eat a studio week

  • Handoff specification

    Spacing, states, tokens, behaviour and edge cases, written up so an engineer does not have to guess or ask. Slow, careful, and almost never quoted for.

  • The weekly client update

    Pure cost, always late, assembled from a board and two conversations. It is also the single biggest driver of whether a client feels well served.

  • Design system upkeep

    The component that drifted, the token that got overridden, the pattern used two ways in the same product. Everyone agrees it should be maintained continuously and nobody has the hours.

  • Brand consistency audits

    Checking a brand against itself across site, product, social and print. Genuinely valuable to a client and hard to sell as a line item.

  • Scoping and estimating

    Turning a vague brief into a scoped proposal, which consumes senior designer time before any money exists.

What changes when the layer is assigned

The design stays with designers. The documentation around it does not have to.

JobTodayAssigned to a worker
Handoff specWritten by the designer at the end of the project, when they are already on the next oneDrafted from the workstream and the Figma connection, then corrected by the designer
Weekly client updateUnbillable, written on a Friday afternoonDrafted from the workstream, reviewed and sent by the account lead
Design system auditDeferred indefinitelyA standing task that reports drift, with the findings as a file on the task
Proposal and scope documentSenior designer time spent before the work is wonA structured draft to argue with, so the senior time goes into the estimate rather than the formatting

How a studio would set it up

The structure

  • One workstream per client or per project
  • Lanes matching your stages, shared between list and board view
  • Docs nested per project, versioned, with review and comments
  • Freelance collaborators added at no cost, because there are no seats

The roster

  • A technical writer for handoff specs and documentation
  • A content writer for client updates and case study drafts
  • A research analyst for competitive and category work in pitches
  • The Chief of Staff keeping every task owned and dated across projects

Next, for a design studio

The Figma connection, the design use cases, and the agency argument if you also resell hours.

Questions people ask

+Can a worker read our Figma files?

Figma is in the connection catalog, so a worker can be given access to it with one click, authorised once for the organisation and stored server-side. What it does with that access depends on the task you assign and the skill file you wrote for it. It is not a design tool and it does not produce design work.

+Is this better than Notion plus a tracker for a studio?

For holding project information, Notion and a tracker are perfectly good and you should not switch on aesthetics. The difference is that neither of them writes the handoff spec or the client update. If the layer costing you margin is documentation rather than organisation, that is the reason to look; if your problem is genuinely organisation, be honest that a free workspace is a smaller win.

+How would we price this into client work?

Hours are itemised on the work log with an estimated human-equivalent hour count per job, produced by an open formula. Whether that becomes a passed-through cost, an absorbed margin improvement or a reason to quote a documentation phase properly is your commercial decision. The evidence supports all three conversations.

+We are four people. Does the workspace cost anything at that size?

No. There is no seat count and no tier, so four designers plus whatever freelancers a project needs cost nothing, and removing them later costs nothing either. The only bill is roughly two dollars per human-equivalent hour that an AI worker delivers.

+Is a design studio a good first user of a beta product?

Honestly, only in one place. Client-facing deliverables in a public beta carry a reputational risk that a studio cannot really afford. Start with something internal, such as your own design system audit or your own case studies, where a weak first draft costs an afternoon and nobody outside the studio ever sees it.

Your next hire takes 60 seconds.

The software is free — unlimited people, tasks, workstreams and docs. You pay only for work an AI worker actually delivers, itemised by the hour.

Get started free

Last checked .