AI subscriptions
The cost of AI subscriptions for a team
Five figures a year at fifty people, and no shared record of what any of it produced.
What it costs
Claude Pro lists at $20 a month, Claude Team at $25 per seat monthly or $20 annual, ChatGPT Business at $25 monthly or $20 annual, GitHub Copilot Pro at $10 a month, and Cursor Pro at $20 with Teams at $40 per user, checked 21 August 2026. A mixed ten-person team commonly pays about $4,440 a year. Polaris charges per hour delivered instead.
- Claude Team
- $25 monthly / $20 annual
- ChatGPT Business
- $25 monthly / $20 annual
- Copilot Pro
- $10 / month
- Checked
- 21 August 2026
AI subscription list prices
Read from each vendor's own pricing page on 21 August 2026. Cursor's page was only partially readable, so this table quotes only the two rates that were unambiguous on it.
- Claude Free$0
- Claude Pro$20 / month
- Claude MaxFrom $100 / month
- Claude Team, standard seat$25 / seat / month
- Claude Team, premium seat$125 / seat / month
- ChatGPT Plus$20 / month
- ChatGPT Business, standard seat$25 / user / month
- ChatGPT Business, premium seat$125 / user / month
- GitHub Copilot Free$0
- GitHub Copilot Pro$10 / month
- GitHub Copilot Pro+$39 / month
- GitHub Copilot Max$100 / month
- Cursor Pro$20 / month
- Cursor Teams$40 / user / month
| Product and plan | Monthly billing | Annual billing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Free | $0 | $0 | Includes Claude Code |
| Claude Pro | $20 / month | $17 / month, $200 upfront | Individual |
| Claude Max | From $100 / month | Not published as a separate rate | 5x or 20x Pro usage |
| Claude Team, standard seat | $25 / seat / month | $20 / seat / month | Teams of 2 to 150 |
| Claude Team, premium seat | $125 / seat / month | $100 / seat / month | More usage than a standard seat |
| ChatGPT Plus | $20 / month | Not offered | Individual |
| ChatGPT Business, standard seat | $25 / user / month | $20 / user / month | From 2 users |
| ChatGPT Business, premium seat | $125 / user / month | $100 / user / month | 5x standard usage |
| GitHub Copilot Free | $0 | n/a | 2,000 completions a month |
| GitHub Copilot Pro | $10 / month | Not published on the plans page | Unlimited completions |
| GitHub Copilot Pro+ | $39 / month | Not published on the plans page | Premium models |
| GitHub Copilot Max | $100 / month | Not published on the plans page | High-volume agent workflows |
| Cursor Pro | $20 / month | Toggle present, rate not readable | Individual |
| Cursor Teams | $40 / user / month | Toggle present, rate not readable | Team plan |
A ten-person team's AI bill
A realistic mixed configuration rather than a worst case: not everyone gets everything, and the annual rate is used wherever a vendor publishes one.
- ChatGPT Business, annual$120.00
- Claude Team standard, annual$80.00
- GitHub Copilot Pro$50.00
- Cursor Teams$120.00
- Total$370.00
- Per person per year$37.00
| Line | Rate | Seats | Per month | Per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Business, annual | $20 / user / month | 6 | $120.00 | $1,440.00 |
| Claude Team standard, annual | $20 / seat / month | 4 | $80.00 | $960.00 |
| GitHub Copilot Pro | $10 / user / month | 5 | $50.00 | $600.00 |
| Cursor Teams | $40 / user / month | 3 | $120.00 | $1,440.00 |
| Total | 10 people, 18 seats | $370.00 | $4,440.00 | |
| Per person per year | 10 | $37.00 | $444.00 |
Eighteen seats for ten people
That is the shape of AI spending in 2026 and it is nobody's fault. Different tools are better at different work, so engineers end up with two subscriptions and everyone else has one, and the seat count exceeds the headcount. Each individual purchase was sensible.
What the $4,440 does not buy is a record. There is no shared log of what came out of those eighteen seats, no artefact a colleague can pick up, and no way to answer at renewal what the money produced. The output lives in chat histories on individual accounts, and when someone leaves it goes with them.
Four properties of per-seat AI that are worth naming
Cost and usage are unrelated
A seat costs the same whether it ran two prompts this month or two hundred. That is the defining property of the model, and it means no AI budget conversation can ever be about output.
Allocation becomes a management task
Because seats are scarce by price rather than by capacity, someone has to decide who gets one. Companies of fifty are running that argument quarterly, and it exists purely because of how the tools are priced.
The work stays single-player
Claude Code, Copilot and Cursor are excellent and they are local. They stop when the laptop closes, teammates cannot see or assign work to them, and there is no shared roster and no audit trail.
Premium seats double the unit twice
Both Claude Team and ChatGPT Business now sell a premium seat at $100 per seat per month on annual billing, five times the standard seat. The same access question comes back one tier up.
Eighteen AI seats against AI workers
Per-seat AI subscriptions
- $4,440 a year for a ten-person team, checked 21 August 2026
- Priced by access, so a quiet month costs the same as a busy one
- Output lives in individual chat histories
- Nothing to assign, review, or hand to a colleague
AI workers in Polaris
- $0 for the workspace, no AI seats to allocate
- Roughly $2 per human-equivalent hour actually delivered
- A worker is a member of the org that anyone can assign a task to
- Deliverables arrive as comments with files, on a task a person closes
Where to go next
What an AI worker costs, and how the hours are counted
The whole formula is on this page, including the parts that make it an estimate rather than a measurement.
Per-seat pricing and usage pricing charge for different things
One model prices access. The other prices output. Almost every argument about software cost is really about which of those you are buying.
Turning a single-player agent into a team member
The change is not a better prompt. It is putting the worker in the same table as the people.
Cloud agents versus local agents
Most teams end up running both. The useful question is which work belongs where.
Tool stack cost for a 50-person team
Three work tools and two AI subscriptions, which is where most companies of this size actually are.
AI worker
The difference between an agent you prompt and an agent you assign work to.
Questions people ask
+How much do AI subscriptions cost per person?
The common team rates checked on 21 August 2026 are $20 per seat per month on annual billing for both Claude Team and ChatGPT Business, $25 on monthly billing for each, $10 a month for GitHub Copilot Pro and $40 per user per month for Cursor Teams. Premium seats on Claude Team and ChatGPT Business are $100 per seat per month on annual billing.
+Why does a ten-person team end up with eighteen AI seats?
Because the tools are good at different things. Engineers typically carry a coding assistant plus a general assistant, and everyone else carries one. Seat count exceeding headcount is the normal outcome of per-seat AI pricing, not a procurement failure.
+Does Polaris replace these subscriptions?
It covers a different job. Claude Code, Copilot and Cursor are single-player tools that run on your machine; Polaris runs AI workers on cloud machines that keep working after you close your laptop, on tasks your teammates can see and assign. Many teams will keep a personal assistant subscription and still move delegated work into Polaris.
+Is there a per-seat charge for AI workers in Polaris?
No. There are no AI seats and no access tiers, so there is nothing to allocate and no argument about who gets one. The only charge is roughly two dollars per human-equivalent hour that a worker delivers, itemised on that worker's log.
+What if the delivered work is not good?
You do not close the task. In Polaris the machine never marks anything done: it posts its work as a comment, ticks its acceptance-criteria checklist and stops. A person closes and rates the task, and until they do, the delivery is open to dispute with the work log alongside it.
Related
What an AI worker costs, and how the hours are counted
The whole formula is on this page, including the parts that make it an estimate rather than a measurement.
Per-seat pricing and usage pricing charge for different things
One model prices access. The other prices output. Almost every argument about software cost is really about which of those you are buying.
Tool stack cost for a 50-person team
Three work tools and two AI subscriptions, which is where most companies of this size actually are.
Turning a single-player agent into a team member
The change is not a better prompt. It is putting the worker in the same table as the people.
Cloud agents versus local agents
Most teams end up running both. The useful question is which work belongs where.
AI worker
The difference between an agent you prompt and an agent you assign work to.
Usage-based pricing
The bill follows consumption, which cuts both ways for buyer and vendor.
Polaris for software teams
Nobody joined your team to write the release notes. Something still has to write them.