People

Policy documents that stay current and show their changes

A policy nobody has updated in three years is worse than no policy. A worker keeps the drafts moving and the versions visible. A qualified adviser signs them off.

What the worker does

An AI worker in Polaris drafts and maintains HR policy documentation in versioned Polaris docs: writing a first draft from your notes, marking what changed between versions, collecting comments from reviewers, and flagging policies that have not been reviewed within the period you set. Whether a policy is lawful where you operate is a question for a qualified adviser, and Polaris does not answer it.

Lives in
Versioned Polaris docs
Connections
Google Drive · Slack · web search
Sign-off
A named human, every time

The failure mode is silence, not error

Most handbooks are not wrong on the day they are written. They go wrong by sitting still: the company moves to four countries, adopts a different working pattern, changes who approves expenses, and the document describes a company that no longer exists.

Nobody updates it because updating it means finding the current version, working out what changed, writing the change, getting someone to approve it, and telling everyone. Five steps, no owner.

A worker can carry four of those five. The approval stays with a person, and it should be a person who is qualified to give it.

What the worker maintains

  • The draft

    A first version written from your bullet points and your existing document, in your own house language rather than boilerplate lifted from somewhere else.

  • The diff

    What changed since the last version, stated in a sentence per change, so a reviewer reads the delta and not the whole document.

  • The review clock

    Any policy past its review date appears as a dated task in the Focus lane with an owner attached.

  • The comment round

    Reviewers comment on the doc; the worker collects unresolved comments into a list and chases the people who have not responded.

  • The publication note

    A drafted announcement of what changed and what people need to do differently, for a human to send.

Draft versus decide

The worker prepares

  • Wording, structure and consistency across documents
  • Cross-references between related policies
  • A summary of what an existing policy currently says
  • Research on the open web, with every source named
  • Version history and change lists

A qualified person decides

  • Whether the policy is lawful in each place you employ people
  • What the company's position actually is
  • Which obligations you are accepting
  • When the policy takes effect
  • Approving and publishing it

Questions people ask

+Can the worker tell us whether our policy is compliant?

No. It can tell you what your document says, what it does not cover, and what public sources it found on a topic, with each source named. Whether that meets your obligations in a specific jurisdiction is a judgment for a qualified adviser.

+Why keep policies in Polaris rather than a wiki?

Because the review cycle is a task, and the task and the document then live in the same place. Docs are a nested tree with versioning and file review, and a policy past its review date can be a dated item in someone's Focus lane instead of a note in a spreadsheet.

+How do we stop the worker inventing a policy position?

Brief it to draft only from material you supply, and to write an explicit open question wherever your notes do not settle a point. A visible list of open questions at the top of a draft is far more useful than a confident paragraph that quietly guessed.

+Can it write the announcement too?

Yes, as a draft. Anything that goes to the whole company about how people are employed is sent by a person, from their own account, after they have read it.

Your next hire takes 60 seconds.

The software is free — unlimited people, tasks, workstreams and docs. You pay only for work an AI worker actually delivers, itemised by the hour.

Get started free

Last checked .