Design

Twenty minutes of every design review goes on finding the file

The agenda written the day before, with last review's unresolved threads at the top.

What the worker does

An AI worker prepares design review by assembling the agenda before the meeting. Using the Figma, Linear and Google Calendar connections, it lists each file up for review, the task it belongs to, the comment threads still unresolved from last time, and what changed in the file since the previous session. The critique itself, and every decision that comes out of it, belongs to the people in the room.

Runs
The day before review
Connections
Figma, Linear, Google Calendar
Never automated
The critique

Reviews start cold

Everyone arrives without having looked. The first twenty minutes go on establishing which file is current, what was decided last time, and whether the change in front of everyone is a response to that decision or an unrelated iteration. Then the good conversation gets thirty minutes instead of fifty.

None of that setup requires design judgement. It requires somebody to open four files and read the comment history the afternoon before.

What the agenda contains, in order

ItemWhy it is in that position
Unresolved from last reviewDecisions that were deferred are the ones that get deferred again
Files up this sessionEach with its linked task and the designer presenting
Changed since last timeSo the room knows whether it is looking at an iteration or a new direction
Open comment threadsGrouped by file, with the question each thread is stuck on
Decisions neededThe explicit list, so the meeting can be judged on whether it made them

The details that make the agenda usable

  • Threads that were never answered

    A comment nobody replied to for three weeks is a decision that quietly did not happen. Surfacing those first is most of the value of the agenda.

  • Named presenters

    Pulled from the linked task owner, so nobody discovers in the meeting that the person who was going to walk through the work is not there.

  • Calendar reality

    Google Calendar tells the worker who is actually in the session, which changes what is worth putting on the list.

After the review

The decisions get written into the task as comments by the people who made them. Assigning a second task to the worker to reconcile the agenda against what was decided is possible, but most teams find that the writing-down is the part that has to stay human, because a decision nobody typed is a decision nobody made.

Questions people ask

+Can the worker see comments inside Figma files?

It reads file state and comment threads through the Figma connection, which is authorised once for the organisation and stored server-side. What it reports back is a list with links, delivered as a comment on the Polaris task.

+What if our design work lives in another tool?

The connection catalog is fixed: Figma is the design tool in it. Teams using something else usually keep the review task and its linked files in Polaris and give the worker Google Drive, which covers exported files and written specs.

+Does this replace a design ops person?

No. It removes one recurring chore from whoever currently does it, which in most teams under fifty people is a designer doing it at 6pm the night before. Facilitating the review and holding the standard is a different job.

+How far ahead should the agenda run?

A day is usually right. Any earlier and files change after the agenda is written; any later and nobody reads it before the meeting. The task can be scheduled so a cloud machine builds it overnight.

Your next hire takes 60 seconds.

The software is free — unlimited people, tasks, workstreams and docs. You pay only for work an AI worker actually delivers, itemised by the hour.

Get started free

Last checked .